ТИПОЛОГИЯ РЕГИОНОВ ПО ИХ ФУНКЦИОНАЛЬНОЙ РОЛИ В ИННОВАЦИОННОМ ПРОСТРАНСТВЕ РОССИИ

Title

Typology of regions by functional role in Russian innovation space

Автор(ы)

А. С. Михайлов, Т. Ю. Кузнецова, И. Ю. Пекер

Author(s)

S. Mikhaylov, T. Yu. Kuznetsova, I. Yu. Peker

DOI

10.5922/1994-5280-2019-4-4

Страницы/Pages

46-57

Статья

Загрузить

Ключевые слова

инновационное пространство, география инноваций, интеллектуальный капитал, научно-технологический потенциал, приморский фактор, приморский регион.

Keywords

 innovative space, innovation geography, intellectual capital, scientific and technological potential, coastal factor, coastal region.

Аннотация

Статья посвящена исследованию неоднородности инновационного пространства России в аспекте оценки территориального распределения и концентрации центров создания нового знания. В качестве рабочей гипотезы принято предположение о существовании регионов трех типов: полюсов роста - крупнейших городов и агломераций, генерирующих значительный объем ново го знания широкой специализации, зон влияния - территорий с высоким генеративным потенциалом в одной или нескольких специфических отраслях знания, и инновационной периферии, демонстрирующей слабую способность к созданию нового знания. Результатом анализа показателей публикационной активности в 2013-2017 гг. в разрезе субъектов РФ методом пространственной наукометрии стало уточнение и детализация первоначальной типологии регионов по их генеративной функции в национальном инновационном процессе. Исследование показало значимость комплекса пристоличного, приморского и приграничного факторов в реализации инновационного потенциала территории. Для приморских регионов, в т.ч. имеющих приграничное положение, характерен более высокий уровень научной продуктивности и интеграции в международное научно-техническое сотрудничество, а также общая положительная динамика прироста нового научного знания. Кроме того, приморский фактор обусловливает специфику тематической направленности создаваемого интеллектуального капитала и базы знаний, накапливаемой в регионе.

Abstract (summary)

The article is devoted to studying the spatial heterogeneity of innovation space across Russia while assessing the regional divergence and concentration of knowledge-generating centers. The preliminary hypothesis suggests there are three types of regions: growth poles - the largest cities and agglomerations that generate a significant amount of new knowledge of wide specialization spectrum; zones of influence - territories with high generative potential in one or several specific knowledge domains; and innovation peripheries that demonstrate weak ability to generate new knowledge. The analysis of an array of indicators on publication activity over 2013-2017 across the regions of the Russian Federation using the method of spatial scientometrics has clarified and detailed the initial typology of regions according to their generative function in the interregional innovation process. The study showed the importance of a complex of metropolitan, coastal and border factors affecting the innovative potential of territories. For coastal regions, incl. having a cross-border position, a higher level of research productivity and integration into international S&T cooperation is characteristic, as well as a general positive dynamics of new knowledge generation if found. In addition, the coastal factor determines the specificity of the subject area of the intellectual capital created and the knowledge base accumulated in the region.

Список литературы

1.       Балашова С.А. Оценка влияния качества национального инновационного потенциала на инновационную активность стран ОЭСР // Экономика и математические методы. 2017. Т. 53, № 1. С. 21–35.

2.       Бабурин В.Л. Инновационные циклы в российской экономике. М.: КРАСАНД, 2010. 216 с.

3.       Бабурин В.Л., Земцов С.П. Факторы патентной активности в регионах России // Мир экономики и управления. 2016. Т. 16, № 1. С. 86–100.

4.       Земцов С.П., Бабурин В.Л. Как оценить эффективность региональных инновационных систем в России? // Инновации. 2017. № 2 (220). С. 60–66.

5.       Локосов В.В., Токсанбаева М.С., Коленникова О.А., Гузанова А.К. Кадровый потенциал организаций академической науки: характеристики и социальная защищенность // Социологические исследования. 2017. № 3 (395). С. 70–78.

6.       Минцаев М.Ш., Ильина И.Е., Парфенова С.Л. и др. Оценка обеспеченности кадровым, научно-технологическим и инновационным потенциалом в разрезе приоритетов научно-технологического развития Российской Федерации // Интеграция образования. 2018. Т. 22, № 3 (92). С. 460–479.

7.       Соколова А.А. Анализ научно-исследовательской деятельности в России: проблемы и перспективы // Науковедение. 2016. Т. 8, № 2 (33). URL: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/40EVN216.pdf (дата обращения: 22.08.2019).

8.       Abramo G., D’Angelo C.A., Di Costa F. A new bibliometric approach to assess the scientific specialization of regions // Research Evaluation. 2014. Vol. 23, № 2. P. 183–194.

9.       Abramo G., D’Angelo C.A., Pugini F. The measurement of Italian universities’ research productivity by a non parametric-bibliometric methodology // Scientometrics. 2008. № 76 (2). Р. 225–244.

10.     Acosta M., Ferrandiz E., Coronado D. et al. Regional scientific production and specialization in Europe: The role of HERD // European Planning Studies. 2014. Vol. 22. № 5. P. 949–974.

11.     Aldieri L., Kotsemir M., Vinci C.P. The role of geographic spillovers in employment policy planning: An empirical investigation for Russian regions // Foresight. 2018. № 20 (3). Р. 289–311. https://doi. org/10.1108/FS-02-2018-0012.

12.     Aristovnik A. Efficiency of the R and D sector in the EU-27 at the regional level: An application of DEA // Lex Localis. 2014. № 12 (3). Р. 519–532. https://doi.org/10.4335/12.3.519-531.

13.     Asheim B.T. Smart specialisation, innovation policy and regional innovation systems: what about new path development in less innovative regions? // Innovation. 2018. № 32 (1). Р. 8–25. https://doi.org/1 0.1080/13511610.2018.1491001.

14.     Asheim B.T., Boschma R., Cooke P. Constructing Regional advantage: Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases // Regional Studies. 2011. № 45 (7). Р. 893–904.

15.     Bachtrögler J., Fratesi U., Perucca G. The influence of the local context on the implementation and impact of EU Cohesion Policy // Regional Studies. 2020. № 54 (1). P. 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00343404.2018.1551615.

16.     Bartkowska M., Riedl A. Regional convergence clubs in Europe: Identification and conditioning factors // Economic Modelling. 2012. № 29 (1). Р. 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2011.01.013.

17.     Calderini M., Scellato G. Academic research, technological specialization and the innovation performance in European regions: an empirical analysis in the wireless sector // Industrial and Corporate Change. 2005. Vol. 14, № 2. P. 279–305.

18.     Candau F., Dienesch E. Spatial distribution of skills and regional trade integration // Annals of Regional Science. 2015. № 54 (2). Р. 451–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0662-4.

19.     Chen K., Kou M., Fu X. Evaluation of multi-period regional R&D efficiency: An application of dynamic DEA to china’s regional R&D systems // Omega (United Kingdom). 2018. № 74. Р. 103–114. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.01.010.

20.     Cojanu V., Robu R. The geography of territorial capital in the European Union: a map and several policy issues // Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences. 2019. № 15 (56E). Р. 23–40. https:// doi.org/10.24193/tras.56E.2.

21.     Esmaeilpoorarabi N., Yigitcanlar T., Guaralda M. Place quality and urban competitiveness symbiosis? A position paper // International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development. 2016. № 7 (1). Р. 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKBD.2016.075444.

22.     Fedorov G.M., Mikhaylov A.S. Regional divergence dynamics in the Baltic region: Towards polarisation or equalization? // Geographia Polonica. 2018. № 91 (4). Р. 399–411. https://doi.org/10.7163/ GPol.0127.

23.     Frenken K., Van Oort F., Verburg T. Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth // Regional Studies. 2007. № 41 (5). P. 685–697.

24.     Grillitsch M., Asheim B. Place-based innovation policy for industrial diversification in regions // European Planning Studies. 2018. № 26 (8). Р. 1638–1662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1 484892.

25.     Guan J.C., Chen K.H. Measuring the innovation production process: A cross-region empirical study of China’s high-tech innovations // Technovation. 2010. № 30 (5). Р. 348–358.

26.     Huggins R., Izushi H., Prokop D., Thompson P. Regional competitiveness, Economic growth and stages of development // Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakultet au Rijeci. 2014. № 32 (2). Р. 255–283.

27.     Hung W.-C., Lee L.-C., Tsai M.-H. An international comparison of relative contributions to academic productivity // Scientometrics. 2009. № 81 (3). Р. 703–718.

28.     Kotsemir M. Unmanned aerial vehicles research in Scopus: An analysis and visualization of publication activity and research collaboration at the country level // Quality and Quantity. 2019. № 53 (4). P. 2143–2173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00863-z.

29.     Kotsemir M., Shashnov S. Measuring, analysis and visualization of research capacity of university at the level of departments and staff members // Scientometrics. 2017. № 112 (3). P. 1659–1689. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2450-7.

30.     Mikhaylov A.S. Coastal agglomerations and the transformation of national innovation spaces // Baltic Region. 2019. № 11 (1). Р. 29–42. https://doi.org/10.5922/2078-8555-2019-1-3.

31.     Mikhaylov A.S., Peker I.Yu. Spatial Distribution of the Intellectual Capital of Russia // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2019. № 28 (6). P. 28–39. https://doi.org/110.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-6-28-39.

32.     Mikhaylov A., Kuznetsova T.Y., Peker I.Y. Knowledge geography: Human geography approach to measuring regional divergence of knowledge capital // Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management (ECKM). Vol. 2. P. 738–745. https://doi.org/10.34190/KM.19.239.

33.     Mikhaylova, A.A., Mikhaylov, A.S. Re-distribution of knowledge for innovation around Russia // International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development. 2016. № 8 (1). P. 37–56.

34.     Shashnov S., Kotsemir M. Research landscape of the BRICS countries: Current trends in research output, thematic structures of publications, and the relative influence of partners // Scientometrics. 2018. № 117 (2). P. 1115–1155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2883-7.

35.     Sooryamoorthy R. Scientific knowledge in South Africa: Information trends, patterns and collaboration // Scientometrics. 2019. № 119 (3). Р. 1365–1386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03096-x.

36.     Zemtsov S., Kotsemir M. An assessment of regional innovation system efficiency in Russia: The application of the DEA approach // Scientometrics. 2019. № 120 (2). Р. 375–404. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11192-019-03130-y.

37.     Zemtsov S.P., Baburin V.L., Kidyaeva V.M. Innovation Clusters and Prospects for Environmental Management in Russia // Geography and Natural Resources. 2018. № 9 (1). Р. 10–15.

38.     Zuo K., Guan, J. Measuring the R&D efficiency of regions by a parallel DEA game model // Scientometrics. 2017. № 112 (1). Р. 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2380-4.

 

Reference

1.       Balashova S.A. Assessment of the impact of the quality of national innovation potential on the innovation activity of OECD countries. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody, 2017, vol. 53 (1), pp. 21–35. (In Russ.).

2.       Baburin V.L. Innovatsionnye tsikly v rossiiskoi ekonomike. Мoscow, 2010. 216 р. (In Russ.).

3.       Baburin V.L., Zemtsov S.P. Factors of patent activity in the regions of Russia. Mir ekonomiki i upravleniya, 2016, vol. 16 (1), pp. 86–100. (In Russ.).

4.       Zemtsov S.P., Baburin V.L. How to evaluate the effectiveness of regional innovation systems in Russia? Innovatsii, 2017, no. 2 (220), pp. 60–66. (In Russ.).

5.       Lokosov V.V., Toksanbaeva M.S., Kolennikova O.A., Guzanova A.K. Personnel potential of organizations of academic science: characteristics and social security. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 2017, no. 3 (395), pp. 70–78. (In Russ.).

6.       Mintsaev M.Sh., Il’ina I.E., Parfenova S.L., Dolgova V.N., Zharova E.N., Agamirova E.V. Assessment of staffing, scientific, technological and innovative potential in the context of the priorities of scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation. Integratsiya obrazovaniya, 2017, vol. 22, no. 3 (92), pp. 460–479. (In Russ.).

7.       Sokolova A.A. Analysis of research activities in Russia: problems and prospects. Internet-zhurnal Naukovedenie, 2016, vol. 8, no. 2 (33). URL: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/40EVN216.pdf [Accessed 22.08.2019]. (In Russ.).

8.       Abramo G., D’Angelo C.A., Di Costa F. A new bibliometric approach to assess the scientific specialization of regions. Research Evaluation, 2014, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 183-194.

9.       Abramo G., D’Angelo C., Pugini F. The measurement of Italian universities’ research productivity by a non parametric-bibliometric methodology. Scientometrics, 2008, no. 76 (2), pp. 225–244.

10.     Acosta M. et al. Regional scientific production and specialization in Europe: The role of HERD. European Planning Studies, 2014, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 949-974.

11.     Aldieri L., Kotsemir M., Vinci C. The role of geographic spillovers in employment policy planning: an empirical investigation for Russian regions. Foresight, 2018, no. 20 (3), pp. 289–311. https://doi. org/10.1108/FS-02-2018-0012.

12.     Aristovnik A. Efficiency of the R&D Sector in the EU-27 at the Regional Level: An Application of DEA. Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 2014, no. 12 (3), pp. 519–531. https://doi. org/10.4335/12.3.519-531.

13.     Asheim B. Smart specialisation, innovation policy and regional innovation systems: what about new path development in less innovative regions? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 2018, no. 32 (1), pp. 8–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2018.1491001.

14.     Asheim B., Boschma R., Cooke P. Constructing Regional Advantage: Platform Policies Based on Related Variety and Differentiated Knowledge Bases. Regional Studies, 2011, no. 45 (7), pp. 893–904.

15.     Bachtrögler J., Fratesi U., Perucca G. The influence of the local context on the implementation and impact of EU Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies, 2019, no. 54(1), pp. 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1551615.

16.     Bartkowska M., Riedl A. Regional convergence clubs in Europe: Identification and conditioning factors. Economic Modelling, 2012, no. 29 (1), pp. 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2011.01.013.

17.     Calderini M., Scellato G. Academic research, technological specialization and the innovation performance in European regions: an empirical analysis in the wireless sector. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2005. vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 279-305.

18.     Candau F., Dienesch E. Spatial distribution of skills and regional trade integration. The Annals of Regional Science, 2015, no. 54 (2), pp. 451–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0662-4.

19.     Chen K., Kou M., Fu X. Evaluation of multi-period regional R&D efficiency: An application of dynamic DEA to China’s regional R&D systems. Omega, 2018, no. 74, pp. 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. omega.2017.01.010.

20.     Cojanu V., Robu R. The Geography of Territorial Capital in the European Union: a Map and Several Policy Issues. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 2019, no. 15 (56E), pp. 23–40. https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.56E.2.

21.     Esmaeilpoorarabi N., Yigitcanlar T., Guaralda M. Place quality and urban competitiveness symbiosis? A position paper. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 2016, no. 7 (1), pp. 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKBD.2016.075444.

22.     Fedorov G.M., Mikhaylov A.S Regional divergence dynamics in the Baltic region: Towards polarisation or equalization? Geographia Polonica, 2018, no. 91 (4), pp. 339–411. https://doi.org/10.7163/ GPol.0127.

23.     Frenken K., Van Oort F., Verburg T. Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth. Regional Studies, 2007, no. 41 (5), pp. 685–697.

24.     Grillitsch M., Asheim B. Place-based innovation policy for industrial diversification in regions. European Planning Studies, 2018, no. 26 (8), pp. 1638–1662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1484892.

25.     Guan J., Chen K. Measuring the innovation production process: A cross-region empirical study of China’s high-tech innovations. Technovation, 2010, no. 30 (5-6), pp. 348–358.

26.     Huggins R., Izushi H., Prokop D., Thompson P. Regional competitiveness, Economic growth and stages of development. Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakultet au Rijeci, 2014, no. 32 (2), pp. 255–283.

27.     Hung W., Lee L., Tsai M. An international comparison of relative contributions to academic productivity. Scientometrics, 2009, no. 81 (3), pp. 703–718.

28.     Kotsemir M. Unmanned aerial vehicles research in Scopus: an analysis and visualization of publication activity and research collaboration at the country level. Quality and Quantity, 2019, no. 53 (4), pp. 2143–2173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-019-00863-z.

29.     Kotsemir M., Shashnov S. Measuring, analysis and visualization of research capacity of university at the level of departments and staff members. Scientometrics, 2017, no. 112 (3), pp. 1659–1689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2450-7.

30.     Mikhaylov A.S. Coastal agglomerations and the transformation of national innovation spaces. Baltic Region, 2019, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 29–42. https:// doi.org/10.5922/2078-8555-2019-1-3.

31.     Mikhaylov A.S., Peker I.Yu. Spatial Distribution of the Intellectual Capital of Russia. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii, 2019, no. 28 (6), pp. 28–39.

32.     Mikhaylov A., Kuznetsova T. Y., Peker I. Y. Knowledge geography: Human geography approach to measuring regional divergence of knowledge capital. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management (ECKM), 2019, vol. 2, pp. 738-745. https://doi. org/10.34190/KM.19.239.

33.     Mikhaylova A.A., Mikhaylov A.S. Re-distribution of knowledge for innovation around Russia. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 2016, no. 8 (1), pp. 37-56.

34.     Shashnov S., Kotsemir M. Research landscape of the BRICS countries: current trends in research output, thematic structures of publications, and the relative influence of partners. Scientometrics, 2018, no. 117 (2), pp. 1115–1155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2883-7.

35.     Sooryamoorthy R. Scientific knowledge in South Africa: information trends, patterns and collaboration. Scientometrics, 2019, no. 119 (3), pp. 1365–1386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03096-x.

36.     Zemtsov S., Kotsemir M. An assessment of regional innovation system efficiency in Russia: the application of the DEA approach. Scientometrics, 2019, no, 120 (2), pp. 375–404. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11192-019-03130-y.

37.     Zemtsov S.P., Baburin V.L., Kidyaeva V.M. Innovation Clusters and Prospects for Environmental Management in Russia. Geography and Natural Resources, 2018, no. 39 (1), pp. 10–15.

38.     Zuo K., Guan J. Measuring the R&D efficiency of regions by a parallel DEAgame model. Scientometrics, 2017, no. 112 (1), pp. 75–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2380-4.